<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Caught Up in God &#187; Jesus</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.vocationquest.org/cenaclearchives/tag/jesus/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.vocationquest.org/cenaclearchives</link>
	<description>Cenacle Journal</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Jul 2010 01:20:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Contrary to Expectations</title>
		<link>http://www.vocationquest.org/cenaclearchives/2010/03/contrary-to-expectations/</link>
		<comments>http://www.vocationquest.org/cenaclearchives/2010/03/contrary-to-expectations/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2010 19:25:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Cybernun</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cross]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Weakness, Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[crucifixion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jesus]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vocationquest.org/cenaclearchives/?p=656</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One of our problems with God is that we have expectations as to how God should work — as to what is proper for divinity.  And God often doesn’t accommodate our expectations.  We know this first from our Jewish heritage, which bequeaths to us the tradition that when God acts, things happen that are out [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of our problems with God is that we have expectations as to how God should work — as to what is proper for divinity.  And God often doesn’t accommodate our expectations.  We know this first from our Jewish heritage, which bequeaths to us the tradition that when God acts, things happen that are out of the ordinary.  For example:</p>
<ul>
<li>the blind see (Isaiah 29:18)</li>
<li>the desert blooms and rejoices (Isaiah 35)</li>
<li>the barren bear many children (Isaiah 54:1)</li>
<li>the wolf shall dwell with the lamb [<em>along with other unlikely companions</em>] (Isaiah 11)</li>
<li>the meek inherit the land (Psalm 37:11)</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>The primary example of the unexpected way in which God works is the cross.</strong></p>
<p>How ridiculous it must have looked — that sign, “King of the Jews” above someone who was stripped, naked, and helpless on the cross!  The one who had claimed to be the bread of life, but now can’t even scratch his own nose, much less feed anyone!  Surely the invitation to take up our cross and follow Jesus is the height of folly.</p>
<p>This wasn’t even a noble death.  Crucifixion was the most shameful method of execution.  If Jesus had been a war hero dying in battle, it might have been considered an honorable death.  Even if he had been a great Greek or Roman philosopher who made a dramatic speech in his defense — that might have been less shameful.  But Jesus didn’t say much at all — a few words, a cry of anguish.  Even as a death, it was disappointing in human eyes.</p>
<p>But as Paul says:</p>
<blockquote><p>The message of the cross is folly for those who are on the way to ruin, but for those of us who are on the road to salvation it is the power of God.</p>
<p style="text-align: right;">(1 Corinthians 1:18 NJB)</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Who would have guessed that out of this weakness — when Jesus couldn’t use his hands, for they were nailed to the wood; couldn’t walk, for his feet were nailed; had wounds on his head from the thorns that were part of the clown costume that the soldiers had made him wear, and his chest wounded by the spear — who would guess that out of this weakness would come new life for the world, new life for each of us?</p>
<p>Who would guess that a public execution would show us the power of God?</p>
<p>Who would guess that God’s power would be made perfect in weakness?  (See 2 Cor 12:9.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.vocationquest.org/cenaclearchives/2010/03/contrary-to-expectations/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What Is Christianity For Anyway?</title>
		<link>http://www.vocationquest.org/cenaclearchives/2009/06/what-is-christianity-for/</link>
		<comments>http://www.vocationquest.org/cenaclearchives/2009/06/what-is-christianity-for/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 01:35:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Cybernun</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Union with God]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Weakness, Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[atheist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Faith]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jesus]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vocationquest.org/cenaclearchives/?p=425</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Stanley Fish, in a recent New York Times column, tackles those he calls the “schoolyard atheists” who insist that religion is either irrelevant or harmful – and in either case, false.  He does this in the context of a reflection on Terry Eagleton&#8217;s book, Reason, Faith and Revolution. When Christopher Hitchens declares that given the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stanley Fish, in a recent New York Times column, tackles those he calls the “schoolyard atheists” who insist that religion is either irrelevant or harmful – and in either case, false.  He does this in the context of a reflection on Terry Eagleton&#8217;s book, <em><a title="Reason, Faith and Revolution" href="http://yalepress.yale.edu/yupbooks/book.asp?isbn=9780300151794" target="_blank">Reason, Faith and Revolution</a>.</em></p>
<blockquote><p>When Christopher Hitchens declares that given the emergence of “the telescope and the microscope” religion “no longer offers an explanation of anything important,” Eagleton replies, “But Christianity was never meant to be an explanation of anything in the first place. It’s rather like saying that thanks to the electric toaster we can forget about Chekhov.”</p>
<p style="text-align: right;"><a title="&quot;God Talk&quot;" href="http://fish.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/05/03/god-talk/?scp=1&amp;sq=God%20talk&amp;st=cse" target="_blank">Stanley Fish, “God Talk,” <em>New York Times</em> (May 3, 2009)</a><img class="alignright" title="What Is Christianity For?" src="http://www.vocationquest.org/journalimages/Assisi-question.jpg" alt="" width="215" height="288" /></p>
</blockquote>
<p><strong>But if Christianity was never meant to explain anything, then what in the world is it for?<br />
</strong><br />
Its purpose is far more important than explaining the intricacies of the human body or how molecules and quarks behave.  Nor is Christianity a set of rules or a list of doctrines.</p>
<p>David Fagerburg, of the University of Notre Dame, quotes Blessed Dom Marmion:</p>
<blockquote><p>Columba Marmion highlighted the fact that Christianity is not a creed or institution or cultic activity or doctrine (although it includes all of these); he says Christianity is Christ&#8217;s life lived by us.   “What in fact is a Christian? &#8216;Another Christ,&#8217; all antiquity replies.”  And what is the life the Christian lives? “A list of observances? In no wise. It is the life of Christ within us … it is the Divine life overflowing from the bosom of the Father into Christ Jesus and, through Him, into our soul.”</p>
<p style="text-align: right;">David Fagerburg, “A Theology of Liturgy,&#8221; <em>Liturgical Ministry</em>, Vol. 14 (Fall 2005)</p>
</blockquote>
<p>&#8220;Christianity is Christ&#8217;s life lived by us.&#8221;  Fagerburg goes on to say that the theological virtues – faith, hope, and love – “understood in this mystical sense, are supernatural participation in the life Christ lived.”</p>
<blockquote><p>In that case, faith is not our belief in God, it is a share of Christ&#8217;s trust in the father; hope is not our optimism, is is Christ&#8217;s confidence in the Father made ours; love is not our affection for the deity, it is Christ&#8217;s filial intimacy with the Father spilled over to include us through the Holy Spirit.</p></blockquote>
<p><strong>How consoling this is!</strong> We hear Paul say:</p>
<blockquote><p>…it is no longer I who live, but it is Christ who lives in me. And the life I now live in the flesh I live by faith in the Son of God, who loved me and gave himself for me.  (Galatians 2:20)</p></blockquote>
<p>Note that an alternate translation of this verse reads, “I live by <strong>the faith of</strong> the Son of God&#8230;”</p>
<p><strong>Is our faith weak? </strong>We draw on the very faith and trust of Christ himself.</p>
<p><strong>Does our hope falter?</strong> We live through the powerful hope of Jesus Christ who, in giving himself, relied totally on the promises of God.</p>
<p><strong>Is our love inadequate to the task of life? </strong>Our own love is always inadequate to the Christian life which calls us to love our enemies, do good to those who hate us, love our neighbor as ourselves, forgive those who sin against us, and love God with all our heart, mind, soul, and strength.</p>
<p>But the love of God is always sufficient.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.vocationquest.org/cenaclearchives/2009/06/what-is-christianity-for/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Who Would Jesus Torture?</title>
		<link>http://www.vocationquest.org/cenaclearchives/2009/05/who-would-jesus-torture/</link>
		<comments>http://www.vocationquest.org/cenaclearchives/2009/05/who-would-jesus-torture/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 18:02:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Cybernun</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Peace]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transformation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Violence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jesus]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vocationquest.org/cenaclearchives/?p=415</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A Pew Research Center survey shows that &#8220;those who attend religious services at least once a week are much more likely than those who seldom or never attend religious services&#8221; to say that torture can often or sometimes be justified against suspected terrorists. (See &#8220;The Torture Debate: A Closer Look&#8220;) Negative Witness The results of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A <a href="http://pewforum.org/docs/?DocID=156" target="_blank">Pew Research Center survey</a> shows that &#8220;those who attend religious services at least once a week are much more likely than those who seldom or never attend religious services&#8221; to say that torture can often or sometimes be justified against suspected terrorists. (See <a href="http://pewforum.org/docs/?DocID=417" target="_blank">&#8220;The Torture Debate: A Closer Look</a>&#8220;)</p>
<p><strong>Negative Witness</strong></p>
<p>The results of the survey have been widely <img class="alignright" title="Who would Jesus torture?" src="http://www.vocationquest.org/journalimages/Who-would-Jesus.gif" alt="" width="296" height="539" />disseminated online, and have hardly offered an appealing image of the followers of the Prince of Peace.  Non-believers have highlighted this survey and pointed out the violence in the Old Testament stories as justification for their negative view of religion.</p>
<p>Some Christians, it is true, believe that every word of Scripture is to have equal weight.  They are unaware of the remarkable development in the Bible, as human beings, under the guidance of the Holy Spirit, learn more and more about who God truly is.  The primitive stories of tribal violence give way to the prophetic voices of love and justice for all peoples, leading finally to the life, death, and resurrection of Jesus.</p>
<blockquote>
<p style="text-align: left;">&#8220;At the resurrection, what the apostolic group began to understand was that there is no violence in God, no wrath, no desire for retribution, no need for vengeance or satisfaction”</p>
<p style="text-align: right;">James Alison, &#8220;Befriending a Vengeful God,&#8221;<br />
<a href="http://www.abc.net.au/rn/relig/enc/stories/s1222837.htm" target="_blank"><em>Encounter</em></a>, October 24, 2004.</p>
</blockquote>
<p><strong>Let us pray</strong></p>
<p>&#8230;that each of us as individuals and all of us as the mystical Body of Christ may take on the mind and heart of the merciful and loving God.</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8216;But I say to you that listen, Love your enemies, do good to those who hate you, bless those who curse you, pray for those who abuse you</p>
<p>&#8216;If anyone strikes you on the cheek, offer the other also; and from anyone who takes away your coat do not withhold even your shirt</p>
<p>&#8216;Give to everyone who begs from you; and if anyone takes away your goods, do not ask for them again.</p>
<p>&#8216;Do to others as you would have them do to you.&#8217;  (Luke 6:27-31)</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.vocationquest.org/cenaclearchives/2009/05/who-would-jesus-torture/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
